Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Шоу: 20 | 50 | 100
Результаты 1 - 2 de 2
Фильтр
1.
Clin Ther ; 45(4): e115-e126, 2023 04.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259419

Реферат

PURPOSE: It has been reported that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have a role in modulation of inflammation associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study assessed the effect of these drug classes on COVID-19-related outcomes. METHODS: Using a COVID-19 linkable administrative database, we selected patients aged ≥40 years with at least 2 prescriptions of DPP-4i, GLP-1 RA, or SGLT-2i or any other antihyperglycemic drug and a diagnosis of COVID-19 from February 15, 2020, to March 15, 2021. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used to calculate the association between treatments and all-cause and in-hospital mortality and COVID-19-related hospitalization. A sensitivity analysis was performed by using inverse probability treatment weighting. FINDINGS: Overall, 32,853 subjects were included in the analysis. Multivariable models showed a reduction of the risk for COVID-19 outcomes for users of DPP-4i, GLP-1 RA, and SGLT-2i compared with nonusers, although statistical significance was reached only in DPP-4i users for total mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97). The sensitivity analysis confirmed the main results reaching a significant reduction for hospital admission in GLP-1 RA users and in-hospital mortality in SGLT-2i users compared with nonusers. IMPLICATIONS: This study found a beneficial effect in the risk reduction of COVID-19 total mortality in DPP-4i users compared with nonusers. A positive trend was also observed in users of GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i compared with nonusers. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the effect of these drug classes as potential therapy for the treatment of COVID-19.


Тема - темы
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacology , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 , Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases/therapeutic use , Glucose , Sodium/therapeutic use
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 59(2): 106516, 2022 Feb.
Статья в английский | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1611755

Реферат

High concentrations of ivermectin demonstrated antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high-dose ivermectin in reducing viral load in individuals with early SARS-CoV-2 infection. This was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dose-finding, proof-of-concept clinical trial. Participants were adults recently diagnosed with asymptomatic/oligosymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Exclusion criteria were: pregnant or lactating women; CNS disease; dialysis; severe medical condition with prognosis <6 months; warfarin treatment; and antiviral/chloroquine phosphate/hydroxychloroquine treatment. Participants were assigned (ratio 1:1:1) according to a randomised permuted block procedure to one of the following arms: placebo (arm A); single-dose ivermectin 600 µg/kg plus placebo for 5 days (arm B); and single-dose ivermectin 1200 µg/kg for 5 days (arm C). Primary outcomes were serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs) and change in viral load at Day 7. From 31 July 2020 to 26 May 2021, 32 participants were randomised to arm A, 29 to arm B and 32 to arm C. Recruitment was stopped on 10 June because of a dramatic drop in cases. The safety analysis included 89 participants and the change in viral load was calculated in 87 participants. No SADRs were registered. Mean (S.D.) log10 viral load reduction was 2.9 (1.6) in arm C, 2.5 (2.2) in arm B and 2.0 (2.1) in arm A, with no significant differences (P = 0.099 and 0.122 for C vs. A and B vs. A, respectively). High-dose ivermectin was safe but did not show efficacy to reduce viral load.


Тема - темы
Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Ivermectin/pharmacokinetics , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Adult , Antiparasitic Agents/blood , Antiparasitic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiparasitic Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/blood , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/virology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Repositioning , Female , Humans , Ivermectin/blood , Ivermectin/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/growth & development , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Treatment Outcome , Viral Load/drug effects
Критерии поиска